Would Fox owning 100% of Sky benefit advertisers? | bambinoides.com " />

Would Fox owning 100% of Sky benefit advertisers?

The proposed acquisition could yet be referred to the competition watchdog, Gideon Spanier writes.

Would Fox owning 100% of Sky benefit advertisers?

 

Rupert Murdoch’s £11.7bn plan to buy the 61% of Sky that 21st Century Fox does not already own has hit a stumbling block.

 

Gideon Spanier –

Culture secretary Karen Bradley has told MPs that she is “minded” to refer it to the Competition & Markets Authority to investigate.

Bradley agreed with Ofcom’s assessment that Fox would be a “fit and proper” owner and the takeover was no threat to broadcasting standards.

However, she felt there was a risk that the deal could threaten media plurality, especially over the provision of news if other providers were squeezed in an already tough market. Advertising is set to fall “over the next two years”, according to an Enders Analysis forecast quoted by Ofcom.

The regulator said Fox’s “undertakings” to protect the editorial independence of Sky News would “mitigate” concerns about plurality but Bradley does not appear to be satisfied. She will make a final decision on a CMA referral after 14 July.

Sky has been an innovator in addressable advertising with its AdSmart and AdVance formats, and Fox has said that is one of the key attractions.

But critics feel that combining Fox and Sky in one powerhouse, with $42bn in annual revenues and potential links to News Corp, owner of The SunThe Times and The Wall Street Journal, could hurt competition. ISBA has written to the newly renamed Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (see below) to warn the takeover “threatens unwarranted consolidation of media ownership, representing a possible threat to advertisers”.

Ofcom’s report also contained criticism from other industry players and observers. One company stated: “The transaction would give Fox/Sky and News Corp increased capacity to advertise to consumers, further draining away advertising revenue from rival producers of print media.” The unnamed company added: “This would threaten its [own] business model and potentially reduce media plurality in the UK.”

A London School of Economics media policy paper, which was cited by Ofcom, said the deal would “enhance Fox and News Corp’s ability to combine with Sky to offer discounted subscriptions and maximise revenues through direct payment, thereby disadvantaging independent competitors”.

Fox has pointed out it is separate from News Corp, even if the Murdoch family controls 40% of the voting shares in both companies, and the media market has changed radically in the past five years as Google and Facebook have gobbled up market share.

 

MAYBE

Ian Whittaker – Head of European media research, Liberum

“Fox owning Sky is unlikely to change the dynamic for advertisers. Given Fox has had much influence over Sky in the past, we would not expect a major change. If Sky does have to dispose of Sky News, we do not think this would be significant for advertisers.”

 

NO

Toby Syfret – Research analyst, Enders Analysis

“I don’t think this deal will affect advertisers. Advertising is not the strategic focus for Fox, which is a separate business from News Corp. This is all about Fox wanting to increase its scale in a global marketplace without boundaries.”

 

NO

Mark Finney – Director of media and advertising, ISBA

“No, we don’t think the merger is good for advertisers. We argued that the proposed merger should be referred to the CMA, so we are happy with the outcome so far. We think this is a sensible decision for the DCMS to have made.

 

YES

Lorna Tilbian – Executive director and head of media, Numis Securities

“An expanded platform which reaches a wider, verifiable audience of real people, rather than bots, in a brand-safe environment is a triumph of commercial reality over prescriptive legislation and technological fragmentation.”

 

 


 Gideon Spanier | campaignlive.co.uk


The views expressed are not necessarily those of the publisher or bambinoides.com. Images accompanying posts are either owned by the author of said post or are in the public domain and included by the publisher of the blog bambinoides.com on its initiative.

Leave a comment

You must be Logged in to post comment.

© 2012-2017 - Copyright - bambinoides.com is not liable for the content of external web pages

© 2012-2017 - © Copyright / Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. / Derechos Reservados & CLÁUSULA DE EXENCIÓN DE RESPONSABILIDAD: bambinoides.com (El BLOG), tiene un carácter divulgativo, informativo y de entretenimiento, poniendo a disposición de todos, informaciones, noticias, reportajes, material audio-visivo y gráfico de contenido variado y sugestivo con el único interés de provocar un sano debate entre amigos e interesados. De no ser especificado, los artículos, comentarios y/o introducciones son escritos y propiedad de Antonio-"Bambino" Maldonado-Boschetti (indistintamente con siglas AMB - ◊◊B◊◊). Además, en EL BLOG se evidencian vínculos y se divulga información originaria de numerosas fuentes por lo que ni El BlOG ni Antonio-"Bambino" Maldonado-Boschetti son particular y específicamente responsables del contenido de aquellas.-- USO JUSTO (Fair Use): Descargo de Responsabilidad: bambinoides.com y/o Antonio-"Bambino" Maldonado-Boschetti (AMB/◊◊B◊◊) no es (son) propietario de la mayor parte de los audios-vídeos que forma parte de la Galería de Vídeos de bambinoides.com los cuales pertenecen a numerosos autores, artistas y/o productores. Aviso y reclamo que los derechos de autor bajo la sección 107 del Copyright Act 1976 (USA) permiten el uso y divulgación de este material con “USO JUSTO” para propósitos tales como crítica, comentario, noticias, enseñanza, becas e investigación. El “USO JUSTO” (Fair Use) es un uso lícito y permitido por la Ley de Derechos de Autor, que de lo contrario podría constituir una violación. El uso sin fines de lucro, educativo, noticioso o informativo, o personal inclina la balanza a favor del “uso justo" por parte de bambinoides.com.-- La información y el contenido "multimedia" publicado por EL BLOG son de carácter público, libre y gratuito. Pueden ser reproducidos con la obligatoriedad de citar la fuente: http://www.bambinoides.com y a cada autor en particular. -- Los comentarios y reacciones de los lectores publicados en los "posts" son de la entera responsabilidad de quien los emite; EL BLOG intenta implementar un mecanismo de auto regulación y/o puede decidir no publicar comentarios que constituyan abuso o que lesionen el buen gusto y los derechos de otros. -- Se pueden enviar colaboraciones gratis directamente a bambino@bambinoides.com quien se reserva el derecho de publicación.
All photos accompanying posts are either owned by the author of said post or are in the public domain and included by the blog bambinoides.com on its initiative.

Creative Commons Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Bambinoides.com está disponible bajo una licencia “Creative Commons” Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0. Cualquier reconocimiento debe ser a bambinoides.com y a cada autor/publicación en particular.

WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien
Confrontando la información, - el pasado y el presente...
"Estudia el pasado si quieres pronosticar el futuro" (Confucio)
“La historia es en realidad el registro de crímenes, locuras y adversidades de la humanidad” (E. Gibbon)