France’s second presidential TV debate more surreal than enlightening |

France’s second presidential TV debate more surreal than enlightening

The second debate in France’s wild presidential campaign on Tuesday night was touted as unprecedented.

The contest marked the first in French television history to feature every candidate in the race before the pack is pared down to two finalists on April 23.

But nearly four hours later, well after midnight Wednesday Paris time, with all 11 candidates having spoken for about 18 minutes each in an interminable cacophony, it was clear why the enterprise had never been tried. The open contest on the BFM TV and CNEWS networks, while laudable in principle, was absurd in effect with so much on the line. And the top candidates, many of whom have been openly lukewarm about contesting a similar third broadcast on April 20, might be wise to stay away.

The campaign’s first debate, on March 20, had featured only the five frontrunners and been an eminently watchable heavyweight battle. Criticised as undemocratic, that contest at least enjoyed a certain logic. Combined, those five participants — National Front spitfire Marine Le Pen, independent-centrist frontrunner Emmanuel Macron, embattled conservative François Fillon, hardline Socialist nominee Benoît Hamon and far-leftist Jean-Luc Mélenchon — are polling at more than 92 percent of the vote.

Tuesday night’s contest added six more hopefuls, five of whom are polling between zero and one percent on voter surveys. The six new contestants were allotted more than half the debate’s speaking time, égalité oblige, drowning out the candidates with a real shot at the prize. Two of those underdogs — Nathalie Arthaud of Workers’ Struggle and Philippe Poutou of the New Anti-Capitalist Party — are rival far-left leaders both labelled Trotskyists, suggesting they cannot even agree on Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky, never mind French policy.

The so-called “little candidates” came out swinging. “I am a man who is angry against all of these heirs of a financial system who are here and who did not want to take the bull by the horns,” Solidarity and Progress candidate Jacques Cheminade said during his opening remarks. Cheminade scored 0.25 percent (89,545 votes) during his last bid for the French presidency, in 2012.

Polling at or below one percent does tend to make the prospect of being held accountable after winning office a moot point, affording the combative minnows a certain leeway with reality and straw-man proposals that can muddle the debate. Self-styled Frexit candidate François Asselineau pushed Tuesday to deploy Article 50 directly, yanking France out of Europe without bothering to call a referendum; Poutou stumped for disarming the police.

Anti-capitalist autoworker

Only 19 days to go before a vote most likely on current polling to see the Europhobic Le Pen and the neophyte independent Macron advance to the May 7 final, radically reshuffling the French political landscape, the stakes are high. But in the end, this night belonged to the race’s minnows. A colourful cast of characters, certainly – one, Jean Lassalle, introduced himself as a former shepherd, while Poutou has a day job as an autoworker at a Ford plant in Bordeaux – but French voters might well have come away feeling they deserved better.

The Trotskyist pair of Poutou and Arthaud delivered some of the evening’s most incisive comments, which says more about the heavyweights’ cautious approach than the iconoclastic communists’ chances of coming from behind to win the Elysée Palace.

Poutou used his 18 minutes of fame to greatest effect when he slammed the race’s scandal-dogged heavyweights, railing against “corrupt politicians, disconnected from reality.” Unshaven, wearing jeans and a longsleeve t-shirt hiked up to his elbows to reveal hirsute forearms, the autoworker politician often sat on the provided stool, his arms crossed, while rivals spoke. “François Fillon, the more we dig, the more we smell corruption, cheating; these are guys who tell us that we need rigour, austerity, when they steal from the coffers,” he charged.

During the first TV debate, Fillon had hardly been troubled by his more mainstream rivals about the fake-jobs scandal that saw him placed under formal investigation over allegations including embezzling public funds. On Tuesday evening, he blithely refused to answer the moderator’s question about the “errors” that have crippled his campaign. “I refuse to answer journalists who for two and a half months have carried out my trial. People have wanted to silence me, to eliminate me. I am still here,” Fillon said.

Lawsuit threat

But Poutou continued to prod. Near the end of the evening, Fillon outright threatened to sue him. “Oh, oh, oh! I’ll stick a lawsuit on you,” the conservative former prime minister muttered under his breath at the fast-talking communist.

“Then there is Madame Le Pen, too, who steals from the public coffers. For someone who is anti-European, it doesn’t bother her to steal from Europe’s coffers,” Poutou charged at the nationalist leader, facing her own scandals. “The National Front says it is anti-establishment, but protects itself thanks to the establishment’s laws with its parliamentary immunity and refuses police summonses, no problem! When we’re summoned by police, we can’t claim labourer’s immunity; we go,” he said, to applause in the studio.

Arthaud levied her own salvo at Le Pen when she was asked how she would protect France, a target of mass terrorist killings since January 2015. “I can say what I won’t do is seize on every attack, every tragedy, to conflate terrorists with migrants, immigrants and Muslims,” she said. “It’s what you do all the time, Marine Le Pen and François Fillon,” she blasted.

The debate’s format of successive 90-second candidate monologues afforded only the briefest of transgressive skirmishes, surreally reined in by overzealous moderators. When Le Pen sought to detail how she would extract France from Europe — the prospect of which has had financial markets on edge for months — one moderator scolded her. “Briefly! Briefly!” the BFM TV journalist said, pressing to close the segment so she could let Lassalle and Arthaud clock in with their own comments. Viewers had to wait 75 minutes for the first real exchange between the elections’ presumptive finalists, Le Pen and Macron, when the pair traded the briefest of jibes to tar one another’s outsider posturing.

“There is no reason why I should have three fewer minutes than Madame Le Pen!” Asselineau complained as the debate dragged on. And no one dared broach the taboo fact that there would have, in fact, been quite a few good reasons.


France24 | © Lionel Bonaventure, AFP | French presidential candidates at the second televised debate on BFM TV and CNEWS on April 4, 2017 | Video by Sharon GAFFNEY | Text by Tracy MCNICOLL

The views expressed are not necessarily those of the publisher or Images accompanying posts are either owned by the author of said post or are in the public domain and included by the publisher of the blog on its initiative.

Leave a comment

You must be Logged in to post comment.

© 2012-2018 - Copyright - is not liable for the content of external web pages

© 2012-2017 - © Copyright / Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. / Derechos Reservados & CLÁUSULA DE EXENCIÓN DE RESPONSABILIDAD: (El BLOG), tiene un carácter divulgativo, informativo y de entretenimiento, poniendo a disposición de todos, informaciones, noticias, reportajes, material audio-visivo y gráfico de contenido variado y sugestivo con el único interés de provocar un sano debate entre amigos e interesados. De no ser especificado, los artículos, comentarios y/o introducciones son escritos y propiedad de Antonio-"Bambino" Maldonado-Boschetti (indistintamente con siglas AMB - ◊◊B◊◊). Además, en EL BLOG se evidencian vínculos y se divulga información originaria de numerosas fuentes por lo que ni El BlOG ni Antonio-"Bambino" Maldonado-Boschetti son particular y específicamente responsables del contenido de aquellas.-- USO JUSTO (Fair Use): Descargo de Responsabilidad: y/o Antonio-"Bambino" Maldonado-Boschetti (AMB/◊◊B◊◊) no es (son) propietario de la mayor parte de los audios-vídeos que forma parte de la Galería de Vídeos de los cuales pertenecen a numerosos autores, artistas y/o productores. Aviso y reclamo que los derechos de autor bajo la sección 107 del Copyright Act 1976 (USA) permiten el uso y divulgación de este material con “USO JUSTO” para propósitos tales como crítica, comentario, noticias, enseñanza, becas e investigación. El “USO JUSTO” (Fair Use) es un uso lícito y permitido por la Ley de Derechos de Autor, que de lo contrario podría constituir una violación. El uso sin fines de lucro, educativo, noticioso o informativo, o personal inclina la balanza a favor del “uso justo" por parte de La información y el contenido "multimedia" publicado por EL BLOG son de carácter público, libre y gratuito. Pueden ser reproducidos con la obligatoriedad de citar la fuente: y a cada autor en particular. -- Los comentarios y reacciones de los lectores publicados en los "posts" son de la entera responsabilidad de quien los emite; EL BLOG intenta implementar un mecanismo de auto regulación y/o puede decidir no publicar comentarios que constituyan abuso o que lesionen el buen gusto y los derechos de otros. -- Se pueden enviar colaboraciones gratis directamente a quien se reserva el derecho de publicación.
All photos accompanying posts are either owned by the author of said post or are in the public domain and included by the blog on its initiative.

Creative Commons Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. está disponible bajo una licencia “Creative Commons” Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0. Cualquier reconocimiento debe ser a y a cada autor/publicación en particular.

WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien
Confrontando la información, - el pasado y el presente...
"Estudia el pasado si quieres pronosticar el futuro" (Confucio)
“La historia es en realidad el registro de crímenes, locuras y adversidades de la humanidad” (E. Gibbon)